Navigating the sea of form builders to find the perfect fit for your distinctive needs can feel like a tech-version of "Where's Waldo?"
While Typeform and Jotform are two renowned form builders, the reality is: they often fall short when it comes to developing bespoke, professional forms that can be incorporated seamlessly into digital products.
That's where Feathery comes into play—checking off the boxes Typeform and Jotform are missing, providing a robust alternative for your form-building needs.
In this comprehensive side-by-side comparison, we will slice through the marketing hype and discuss the features, strengths, and disadvantages of each platform in depth.
You will learn how each form builder handles integrated product forms, form fields with conditional logic, complex flows, and more.
But first, let’s take a look at this quick comparison table.
A quick comparison table: Typeform vs Jotform vs Feathery
Typeform is a versatile online form and survey builder known for its user-friendly, interactive design. It enables businesses and individuals to create engaging and intuitive forms, surveys, quizzes, and more, using its simple drag-and-drop interface.
With a focus on conversational engagement, Typeform enables you to break away from traditional static forms. Instead, it helps you create experiences that feel more like a friendly chat. Each question is presented one at a time, which reduces form fatigue and improves completion rates.
Apart from its core functionality, Typeform also offers a wide array of templates, making it easier for users to design forms quickly. Its compatibility with various integrations such as Hubspot, Zapier, and Google Analytics enhances its functionality, enabling users to automate responses and manage data more efficiently.
While Typeform is great for creating simple, stylish forms and surveys, it may fall short for more complex scenarios that require complex logic or highly customizable design needs.
When it comes to crafting bespoke, professional forms that can blend seamlessly into digital products, Typeform doesn’t quite hit the mark.
Pros and cons
- Unique and attractive user interface. It presents one question at a time, creating a conversational feel
- Provides an interactive experience for improved customer engagement
- Supports multimedia elements such as images, videos, and GIFs within the form
- Integrates well with many other popular tools
- Not the best tool if you’re looking to create bespoke, professional forms that can be embedded in digital products
- Customization can be less detailed compared to Feathery and Jotform
- The free plan has some significant limitations, and the paid plans might be a bit pricier compared to other platforms
- Form layout is fixed to one question per screen, which may not be preferred by all users
- Steep learning curve
Jotform is a powerful online form builder well-suited for both businesses and individuals looking to collect and manage data seamlessly. Known for its ease of use, Jotform enables users to create diverse forms such as contact forms, order forms, event registrations, and surveys, all without needing to write a single line of code.
Jotform's intuitive drag-and-drop interface simplifies the form creation process, and its vast selection of templates helps users quickly design forms for a multitude of use cases. Additionally, Jotform stands out with advanced features such as payment processing and file uploads, enhancing its versatility.
Similar to Typeform, Jotform also supports a wide range of integrations, including popular email marketing services, Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems, cloud storage platforms, and more, making it an ideal tool for streamlining data management workflows.
While Jotform is ideal for users who need to create a broad range of simple to moderately complex forms, it lacks the ultra-flexible design capabilities or advanced logic features required by users looking to create more complex, product-grade forms.
Unlike Feathery, which empowers you to create bespoke, professional forms which you can easily use in digital products, Jotform doesn't quite measure up.
Both Jotform and Typeform lack the capabilities to smoothly integrate such tailor-made, professional forms into your digital products.
Pros and cons
- It is customizable to some degree (Jotform-specific)
- Has a wide variety of form fields and advanced features
- Provides a traditional form layout, which may be more familiar and intuitive to some users
- The user interface is functional but less modern and visually appealing compared to Feathery and Typeform
- Forms might load slower with high levels of customization or if they include many fields
- Not the optimal choice for crafting bespoke, professional forms intended for seamless embedding into digital products
Feathery is a cutting-edge form builder designed to cater to more advanced, product-grade use cases. It aims to provide product teams, professionals, and enterprises with a powerful and flexible tool to create bespoke form flows such as signups, onboarding, and more.
Compared to Typeform and Jotform, which don’t hit the mark when it comes to creating bespoke, professional forms that can blend seamlessly into digital products, Feathery thrives in these advanced use cases, successfully enabling the creation of bespoke form flows.
It harnesses the power of advanced rules and actions, open-source Software Development Kits (SDKs), and granular CSS customization options. These tools provide the flexibility required for building professional, tailored forms that can be fully branded and self-hosted.
The resultant forms appear as an integral part of your digital product or website, offering a seamless user experience that neither Jotform nor Typeform can rival.
Moreover, Feathery's extensive third-party integrations make the possibilities for enhancing your forms and workflows virtually limitless.
A standout feature that’s worth mentioning is its fully flexible 2D visual editor. This drag-and-drop form builder empowers users to craft custom layouts and content. It offers the flexibility and ease-of-use of platforms like Webflow but is tailored to form creation.
This flexibility extends not only to the design of the form but also to its logic, with support for conditional branching, loops, multiple entry and exit points, and more.
Feathery has a keen focus on developer experience. It offers open-source SDKs for embedding forms and provides flexible APIs to extend form logic with custom components, styles, and code.
This enables you to have granular control over the data handling process, such as sending form data to your database or running custom validation checks.
Feathery also offers advanced tracking and analysis capabilities, allowing users to track user behavior, generate actionable insights, and even run A/B tests natively on the platform.
Typeform and Jotform don’t offer any option to perform A/B tests directly within the platform, further demonstrating Feathery's edge in offering a more comprehensive, adaptable form-building solution.
Along with third-party integrations, Feathery also provides advanced connections, allowing you to link your forms directly to services like Firebase, Stytch, Plaid, or Segment.
This is a significant advantage as it enhances your forms' capabilities and offers a more integrated and streamlined experience, something that isn't universally offered by other form builders such as Typeform and Jotform.
If your requirements extend beyond basic surveys and simple forms, and you're looking for a tool built with product teams in mind, Feathery may be the ideal solution for you.
Feathery’s capabilities far outstrip those of more traditional form builders such as Typeform and Jotform, positioning it as the form builder of choice for those seeking high quality, adaptability, and performance in their digital products.
Pros and cons
- Emphasizes speed and performance, providing fast-loading forms and pages
- Your go-to form builder if you’re looking for a high level of customization
- Designed to handle traffic at scale, making it a good choice for businesses anticipating rapid growth
- Provides advanced tracking and analytical features
- Given its rich features and capabilities, there might be a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with more advanced form-building tools. This might be especially true for non-technical users
- Fully harnessing Feathery's potential could require more time during the initial setup and customization phases
What are the core differences between Typeform, Jotform, and Feathery?
Now, let’s dive deep into an insightful comparative analysis of the core differences between Typeform, Jotform, and Feathery. To make it easier for you, we’ve broken them down into five categories.
No matter your technical skill level, with Feathery you can swiftly create and modify forms while preserving a delicate equilibrium between ease-of-use and functionality.
Equipped with an intuitive 2D visual editor featuring a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, Feathery makes it easy to create powerful forms and layouts. It’s the perfect tool to craft forms that are in perfect alignment with your particular needs.
Typeform offers a simple visual builder where users can control the text, question type, and a subset of styles like colors and images.
It adopts a conversational style, presenting one question at a time to keep the respondent focused. However, the editor is not fully visual or 2D like Feathery, and while it provides customization, it doesn't allow the same level of layout control.
Jotform, on the other hand, presents a more traditional approach with a fairly straightforward form editor, which allows you to manage text, question types, and basic styling options such as color schemes and images.
While it offers the convenience of a drag-and-drop interface, Jotform is not as visually focused as Typeform and lacks the depth and flexibility found in Feathery's 2D visual editor.
Jotform is a reliable option for simpler form creation needs. But when it comes to more advanced, product-grade use cases that demand higher levels of customization and functionality, Feathery holds the edge. Its visual editor strikes the perfect balance between simplicity and versatility, making it the ideal tool for crafting forms that are tailored precisely to your unique needs.
Feathery was built from the ground up with developer experience in mind.
It provides open-source SDKs, including a React library, which you can utilize to embed Feathery forms into your website. Moreover, the SDKs offer versatile APIs for extending your form logic with custom components, styles, and code.
For example, you might want to send form data to your own database or do a custom validation check (a credit check based on user info or payment validation).
Typeform enables their forms to be embedded, but currently, they don't offer an API for extending their forms with custom code.
In contrast, Jotform does allow for form embedding, but it currently lacks the provision of an API for augmenting their forms with custom code.
For those seeking a robust, customizable, and user-friendly form-building solution, Feathery is the go-to choice.
Feathery fully supports conditional step branches, loops, and multiple entry and exit points to the form, as well as hidden fields and custom code to personalize each user's path as they fill out the form.
Feathery also offers flexible field validation out-of-the-box. For example, you can extend fields with arbitrary patterns or compose different rules (the input must be both positive and an integer).
Typeform has limited support for conditional branches and offers basic validation — email pattern validation for email fields, numbers for number fields, and so on.
Currently, there's no way to extend a Typeform to support complex validations over multiple fields or server-side.
On the other hand, Jotform's approach to form logic falls somewhere in between that of Feathery and Typeform. It does offer conditional logic, but it isn't as comprehensive or as flexible as Feathery's. While Jotform does support hidden fields and basic validation similar to Typeform, it lacks the ability to customize each user's path through the form in the way that Feathery can.
When it comes to complex validation such as applying arbitrary patterns or composing different rules, Jotform's capabilities are rather limited, much like Typeform.
For example, there is currently no provision to extend a Jotform to support complex validations over multiple fields or server-side. This aspect again highlights Feathery's superiority in offering a more versatile and developer-friendly environment.
Feathery excels in providing advanced analytics capabilities, automatically tracking user behavior such as conversions, clicks, and dropoff-rates. These tracking metrics then translate into actionable insights.
For instance, it might reveal that "Step 4 is causing 50% of user drop-off," which is invaluable information for enhancing user engagement and reducing drop-offs. Additionally, A/B tests can be executed directly on the platform, providing a robust mechanism to quantitatively enhance conversion rates.
In contrast, Typeform offers only basic metrics like overall completion rate and does not natively support running A/B tests. This limited range of analytics might restrict your understanding of user behavior and subsequently the potential for conversion rate optimization.
When compared to Jotform, Feathery's analytical capabilities are also superior. Jotform provides some form analytics features such as form views, submission data, and conversion rates. However, it does not delve as deeply into user behavior as Feathery does.
In addition, Jotform does not support native A/B testing, which can be crucial for optimizing your forms and boosting conversion rates.
Typeform and Jotform offer a wide range of integrations with popular tools in different categories, such as CRM, email marketing, collaboration tools, and more. This includes integrations with software like Salesforce, Mailchimp, Slack, and Google Sheets, among others.
If you're building a financial application, you can have your user link their financial data on Feathery via Plaid. You can also use Feathery’s public APIs to build your own integrations.
All three tools provide a free version that grants access to basic features. Users can also take advantage of a free trial period to explore premium features for each tool.
The lowest-paid plan for Jotform starts at $39 per month, while the highest-paid plan is available at $129 per month.
Typeform’s lowest-paid plan, is a bit more affordable than Jotform, starting at $26 per month. Its highest-paid plan is priced at $95 per month.
In terms of pricing, Feathery's Basic plan starts at $49 per month, which is slightly higher compared to Jotform and Typeform.
However, when considering the features offered, Feathery stands out by providing up to 2,500 monthly form submissions. In comparison, Typeform offers up to 100 submissions per month, while Jotform allows up to 1,000 monthly submissions.
This higher submission limit makes Feathery an attractive option for users with greater form submission needs. Here’s a detailed breakdown of Feathery’s features.
Feathery also provides an added benefit through its detailed customization options with granular CSS properties, as well as its advanced rules, actions, open-source SDKs, and third-party integrations.
This means that your forms can be fully customized and self-hosted. Your forms will blend seamlessly into your product or website, and your users might not even notice that you're using a form builder.
In addition, Feathery's dashboards are more comprehensive compared to Typeform and Jotform. Its custom pricing for enterprise solutions caters to the specific needs of larger organizations.